This is the finale of a 3 part series on the Bigfoot Massacre Theory.
For those who didn’t catch the 2 + hour long Squatch-D TV show of April 26th, featuring Thom Steenburg, Russell Acord and Rictor Riolo, we finally put the “Bigfoot Massacre” Theory to rest.
Part one featured Thom, showing where false assumptions and using less than stellar copies of evidence led to the incorrectly formed opinions of the authors of the massacre. According to Davis there were two massacres, one in Bluff Creek and one earlier in Blue Creek. The basis of the Bluff Creek massacre was alleged photographic evidence showing “blood.” The Blue Creek one was that of Bob Titmus leading a tracking dog owned by a Dale Moffitt and John Green. In actuality Titmus was not present at all and again “interpretation” of a badly color corrected film.
Getting the facts straight
Steenburg also brought up the FACT that it was Keith Chiazarri (a pilot) there, not Bob Titmus. The article covering his surprise trip to Orleans, Ca. is covered here:
Below are pictures of Chiazarri confused by the theorists as Bob Titmus.
Chiazarri (claimed to be Titmus by the massacre theorists) in various frames on left. Chiazarri with Dale Moffitt on right. Chiazarri with John Green below.
We also talked about Al Hodgson admitting he was wrong about Bob Titmus being there as he had mistakenly said that to the late Bobbie Short.
Steven Streufert 2011 interview with Al Hodgson – Source Bigfoot Books Blog
A quick note: Blood will turn black relatively in quick fashion as the iron in the hemoglobin oxidizes.
Psychologically
Now let’s look at some “Post Offense” behaviors by the alleged “suspects.”
After the alleged massacre, John Green, Rene Dahinden, Bob Titmus, Roger Patterson all wanted to prove the existence of Sasquatch right?
So did they bring any evidence forth? NO!
What one did, Roger Patterson, is bring a controversial film forward that proved NOTHING! So after the critics backlash why didn’t Roger go back and find some biological evidence?
He wasn’t making millions which any and all of them could have done bringing back a body. If the payoff was from loggers, why show the film and put yourself there? And why would the film get support from people, like Green, Dahinden, Titmus who were not receiving payment from Paterson?
If the payment was from loggers to eradicate a nuisance problem, post offense behavior would be to say and do nothing about it. Not show a film.
Legally
Would they be worried about being arrested for murder?
Well legally the answer to that would be NO.
Here’s why:
- You have to prove that the creature killed is part of the homo genus.
- Once and IF that would be established, it would get a date.
- You cannot go behind that date and charge someone with a crime, because on that date, it’s genus, had yet to be established. Therefore not making it a crime at the time of the alleged offense.
Another example is in a penalty phase of a convicted crime; hence why if in a death penalty state if you get convicted of a capital murder that occurred before the death penalty was established and written into law, the death penalty cannot be applied to such a conviction.
NONE of the massacre theorists “reasoning,” both legally and (in criminal psychology “post offense”) behaviorally makes any sense.
People forget too that a somewhat naïve and conceited cryptozoologist decided on his own accord in 2008, convinced what the massacre theorists had said was true, had written the Humbolt County D.A. at the time to investigate the claims. He interjected himself into saying if contacted he could give sources and “evidence.” I am sure that “letter” is framed somewhere today with people pointing and snickering to it.
No rebuttal or admission they were wrong, just more nonsense
One would think that if presented the evidence a logical person would say…oops, I made some mistakes. No actually Davis removes logical questions and points about the massacre theory being wrong.
The new proponent in this field with the loudest voice lately has been, not only “ I drank the Melba-Ketchum Kool-Aid” researcher Scott Carpenter but also internet bully Steve Isdahl.
And make no bones about it; Isdahl IS a cyber-bully. Often telling people, stay off the internet or people are going to pay or be scared. The only thing I can say positive about the guy is at least he isn’t hiding behind a screen name like so many other of the mindless followers that see fit to throw threats to an 88 year old man by the name of Bob Gimlin.
People have called putting fact out as character assassination, yet one person who accused us of doing that began to talk about John Green’s father. Now if that’s grasping at straw and character assassination I don’t know what is.
But these are FACTS:
If you don’t think what I say is true, look at the video “Debunking the Texas Fence Walker.” Anyone who thinks that a Sasquatch has skinny legs like that, and doesn’t see the pants…well I have little hope in your objectivity. Also notice how cleaner my enhancements are than that of Davis very short, grainy enhancement.
If you don’t think Isdahl (Mr. HowToHunt) is not out for the clicks…just look at this graphic. (Remember he used to say Bigfoot was supernatural…ask yourself how would they have killed them then?). Proof of being disingenuous if you ask me.
Our third proponent, Scott Carpenter who likes to bring up Bobbi Short, an elderly woman at the time of her writings, and proven by Al Hodgson’s own comments he was incorrect about Titmus being on scene.
People have told me that they do not believe Carpenter intentionally hoaxes. But I ask the question,”Why no video showing any movement of the alleged subject?”
This is one of the “BlobSquatchers” we talk about. A guy with allegedly all this acumen, is not investigating further on his “alleged” evidence?
But even if not… he is what we classify as the “Unintentional Hoaxer.” The guy who goes out and sees Sasquatch in everything and more often than not. And uses pareidolia to either fool his audience or justify to his audience what they are looking at is a Sasquatch.
At the very least it should question his reasoning ability.
Here are the proponents and who they actually are.
The above are not character assassinations, but all FACTS! They are all out for clicks and relevancy by producing either phony, disingenuous or totally naïve information without relevant investigation on the Bigfoot phenomena.
That being said, we can put this stupid notion (and that’s all it is) that a bigfoot massacre occurred at Blue Creek and Bluff Creek to rest.
Till Next Time,
Squatch-D
What’s old is new again
So here I sit on day 33 of my COVID-19 Social Distancing marathon. What do my eyes spy?
Well last week on Squatch-D TV we talked about Bob Heironimus, in relation to the Patterson-Gimlin Film, and his claims to being “the man in the suit” and how psychologically his story didn’t fit, it morphed into the ridiculous Bigfoot Massacre Theory espoused my Marlon K. (MK) Davis over a decade ago.
Davis was once hailed a hero over his work, stabilizing and enhancing the PG Film in ways it had never been done. But on a spring day in 2008 I received a call from a colleague at a Bigfoot conference, stating now MK was telling a tale of coverup, conspiracy and a massacre regarding the PG film.
MK Davis
All from some interpretation, by an amateur nonetheless, of his enhanced film. How you get a conspiracy theory, complete with assassins from Canada, bulldozers and lime burying a family of Sasquatch is clearly more talented than remote viewing a Bigfoot by a bunch of women claiming they are researchers.
My view on the massacre theory!
But I digress, because why this “theory” is complete and utter donkey fodder we shall discuss on Squatch-D TV on April 26, 2020 with Russell Accord and a special guest, what the real story is how a huckster new to the scene is piping in, an obvious attempt for more clicks.
The in turn caused the ringmaster to chime in along with his puppet who believes in virtually anything, (i.e.. “Angel DNA” Bigfoot aka Ketchum Project).
Scott Carpenter and a stump…(er Bigfoot!) Hmm..couldn’t put that camera in video mode?
Let me stop and say, there are people out there that say, “Ignore them”, or, “They can believe what they want.”
While that is true with “belief”, it is not with an allegation, and Bob Gimlin is still alive so they cannot and should not, be ignored. And Bob is now receiving threats according to manager Russell Acord.
But since mid-last year, there’s this cat that believes he is the “know it all” of Bigfoot maybe because he is some big game hunter and tracker.
Steve Isdahl… Bigfoot Rookie & Know-it-all.
People flock to him like he is “in-the-know.” He apparently had an encounter with a Sasquatch, but if true, it has sent him off the rails. At first he seemed normal, but then we have the usual crap we see from the “wanna-be” Bigfoot stars.
“Bigfoot is demonic.” “People in the Bigfoot Community are paid to say it’s flash and blood in some conspiracy, specifically Dr. Meldrum.”
Ah..we’ve seen this type in the Bigfoot world before. Their fame fades quickly.
He claims to speak to witnesses and give their accounts, (with no investigation I might add). He is in all appearances the Canadian Linda Newton Perry.
He says he, “Doesn’t give a F**K about what people think.” Let’s see!
He said he challenges people to challenge him…
In December I sent a PM to open a dialogue, even giving him my phone number… all I heard were crickets!
And now he jumps on the Massacre bandwagon and his sheeple followers say to him, “Thank you for exposing this,” like it is something new. News flash…it’s not.
He slammed Todd Standing, his Canadian brethren, but then again, hoaxers don’t like company.
But here is a question from the “enlightened one.” If Bigfoot is supernatural, demonic, etc. how do you expect us to believe a family of them is killed?
Did they use Holy Water? Silver Bullets? A Proton Pack?
I mean, you said they were supernatural and / or demonic?
Or was this particular “clan” flash and blood? I am confused.
Seems a bit disingenuous doesn’t it?
Well, we will be tackling this issue more in depth on the show of April 26, 2020 (9PM Eastern on Squatch-D TV) .
Currently here is our exciting show lineup…
We hope to see y’all in chat on the shows.
Please stay safe and healthy, God Bless!!
Till Next Time,
Squatch-D
Share this: