Guess who owns Bigfoothoaxer.com?

Here’s a little find by the Squatchdetectives, (that’s what my posse is called, LMAO!).

A little site found by chance smearing the names of several researchers and groups including the Olympic Project, Steve Alcorn, Derek Randles, Bart Cutino, all of Team Tazer.

Funny if Dyer is such good friends with Derek Randles and are having him, like he’s claimed, coming to see the body why is he smearing his name?

Created on February 1st 2013.

 

 

Funny how he includes his own link on a page that states,  “Everyone on this site is a Hoaxer or is supporting a hoax!”

I know, I know… but it is quite ironic.

The site BigfootToday.com is a redirect to Dyer’s smear blog (also created Feb 1, 2013). But look who owns both:

As far as Issleb’s Middle School antics, well it just shows his maturity level, and he’s so wrong about so much too, it’s laughable! Nice try, but it the funny thing is, his source was me!!!

Check out my March 12th, 2013 blog!!!

Too funny, but I got out of High School a long time ago, it doesn’t bother me, and unfortunately for Issleb this has backfired on him.

But as usual, why are questions not being answered on Issleb’s Facebook page?

Why are people sincerely questioning Dyer and Issleb being blocked?

Funny thing is… People think I’m obsessed with Dyer and or Issleb. Nope, I’m haven’t even doing much lately, but my Squatchdetectives have. I come home from work, and not from W-A-L-Squiggly-M-A-R-T either, and have the stuff handed off to me. That’s how much people dislike them.

Now who is obsessed? Dyer and Issleb!

 

Till Next Time,

Squatch-D

Mr. Lindsay… I have no animosities, quite the opposite.

In a post last night Robert Lindsay wrote this,

 

 

I have a large amount of animosity towards Dyer?

Mr. Lindsay the one whom stated he hates Dyer, yet I have never stated I hate Dyer. That’s because I don’t. In fact I’ve had two phone conversations with him in the last two weeks.

It is Dyer that goes into personal diatribes, making threats of all out war, for me simply providing the facts and stating how much of this is a hoax. If he had a body though, why would he be so mad?

Every post here has been backed up by

• Contradictory Statements by Dyer/Issleb/FBFB
• Facts are provided with documentation and/ or with back links
• In cases where things have been wrong, they have been corrected or annotated.
• And in some cases humor but never hatred.

Perhaps hoaxers and the uneducated about why I do what I do should  read the My 5 Tenets of Bigfoot research.

 

Click on Picture

In fact I remained out of the fracas the last time Dyer stated he had a Squatch and the MiB’s took it and his alleged trip to Canada.

Obviously Robert has been taking what Mr. Dyer has stated to heart which is the worst thing anyone can do. Verify…verify..verify.

Now apparently Dyer has been saying some more interesting things, although my source of this is from Robert Lindsay and not Dyer:

 

If this is what Dyer is saying… well again we told you so..again!

Sounds a little bit ridiculous again.

Now again to the statement as to the Hot Docs film festival:

 

In actuality as we seen from response by Charlotte Cook, the response is not just limited to the “last 3 minutes” but to the entire film and ANY film in the festival.

 

 

 

None of them are talking about the content of ANY FILM. Can’t make that any clearer. They can’t either.

Sounds like the responses FBFB got were written to specific questions and the 3 minute comment was not spontaneous like the Dyer camp and FBFB would like you to believe.

Here’s the recently found write up for “Shooting Bigfoot”  in the Hot Docs flyer,

 

Click picture to go to link

Take that “extreme lengths” comment how you will.

I take it is as “ambiguous.”

But begs to ask the question, If it contains something so spectacular, why is it so far down on the list?

Why isn’t it being billed as “Proof that will shock the world?”

What happened to that press conference with the film makers Dyer promised us in October?

Till Next Time,

Squatch-D

More weigh in on the hoax…

This one is from the Bigfoot Police YouTube Channel…. GREAT ANALYSIS!!!

 

Video from the Bigfoot Police

What more can I say, they’re spot on. Thanks!!!

Till Next Time,

Squatch-D

To all the Kool-Aid Drinkers…

There have been some attempting obviously at the inspiration and direction of Mr. Dyer, to insult, harass and harangue via comments, though they have been miniscule.

 

 

If for one minute they think there posts are getting through, they are wrong.

And when I say Kool-Aid drinkers, it’s okay to believe what he says. It’s another to attack people with hatred, because they have an opposing views. By Kool-Aid Drinkers, I mean the ones who go on the attack at Dyer’s whim. 

They are the ones obsessed by Dyer, and I had an interesting conversation over the last few days with some folks with psychological backgrounds.

 

 

See if you talk to Dyer, he’ll ask you if you if you believe in Bigfoot. If you say yes then you run the gambit of joining his ranks in a cult mentality.

I mean let’s look at the facts. Is internet harassment legal? No. But you do it at his bequest. Come on sheeple!

That’s what a cult is, a person or organization that controls your mind, despite the facts and evidence and makes you do things you would not normally do.

A cult leader (normally all sociopaths) use your beliefs and twists them to their advantage.

And every time someone gets the straight dope on him, he gets angry, name calls and makes lies. And makes his sheeple do his dirty work.

 

Baby need his blanket??? Dyer mad as hell.

 

Why am I after Dyer? This is what I do when I have a hoaxer that tries to intimidate people who disagree with him. AND I DON’T BACK DOWN!

Am I obsessed with Rick Dyer? No. But I am obsessed with getting the people of the same ilk, hoaxers, and especially ones that keep coming back like bad gas pains from a night of binge eating chili by a camp fire.

Don’t think that any of your insults, name calling and proof that you are need of serious psychological  intervention, that Dyer has inspired will show up here.

They won’t.

And they all get kicked to the spam box after the first one…so I don’t see them either ever again!

 

 

Till Next Time,

Squatch-D

Who is David Durett?

A question came in today from a Facebook user regarding the response to the FBFB inquiry to Hot Docs.

 

“Question, who is David Durett and why did he say he received an unsolicited email from the folks at HotDocs – when clearly he did IN FACT email them?

The email from HotDocs starts out by saying, "Many thanks for getting in touch." Clearly that was not true.

Why did Mr. Durett only ask about the last 3 minutes of the film? That is all they addressed, other than Justin Mah had IN FACT seen the movie. I thought this was a movie which had footage of an alleged dead bigfoot? So, why wouldn’t the whole 90 minutes (which isn’t that much for the find of the century) be devoted to this dead undocumented primate? I

f only 3 minutes at the very end is the only mention of this dead bigfoot – either Morgan Matthews needs to find another line of work (cause he is really dropping the ball here) — or it is as we all assume – Dyer has no dead bigfoot.”

 

Answer:

David Durett is the artist that did the drawing of Issleb’s rendition of the head of the body.

 

 

His artwork (including the “Bigfoot”) can be found here:

http://daviddurrett.com/

On the site underneath the picture it states:

This acrylic painting of a Bigfoot cadaver is based on several interactions with Musky Allen, who related his description of the creature shot by Rick Dyer to David on March 10, 2013 for a forensic rendering in the way a police-artist sketch is created. It includes subsequent revisions following input from Rick Dyer. This image is possibly the first clear, close-up view of a Sasquatch ever presented. For more information on this ongoing story please click here. (Cryptomundo link)

So could Durett be another administrator from FBFB? Another Dyer plant?

The letter definitely wasn’t unsolicited as stated. 

Till Next Time,

Squatch-D