April Fools joke or not a story emerged from Ratcliff, Texas where some intrepid commenters have solved the mystery more accurately than the state biologist, Brent Ortego contacted to watch the film and throw an opinion.
As the story begins a local couple there caught something in their live capture trap, and what they saw in the cage they weren’t expecting.
The “creature” captured in the cage. (Photo Credit: CrossRoadsToday.com)
Chupacabra Found Alive?
by Janelle Bludau Newscenter 25.
RATCLIFFE – Deep in the back woods of South Texas, you never know what might be lurking around the corner, or in your tree.
"He saw this strange animal up here eating corn," Jackie Stock said.
In Ratcliffe, a small town in DeWitt County, residents are certain they’ve found the mythical, despicable chupacabra, and this time, it’s alive.
Ratcliffe Resident Jackie Stock said her husband caught the creature Sunday night.
“He called me to come and look, and I said ‘Bubba that looks like a baby chupacabra,’” Stock said.
With its hairless back, large claws, countless teeth and ferocious growl, many would say this animal fits the bill.
“I hunted coons for 20 years with dogs and I ain’t ever seen anything that looks like that right there,” Ratcliffe resident Arlen Parma said.
Parma said one of the biggest signs it’s not a raccoon is its growl.
“A coon doesn’t make that noise, or a possum. What makes that noise? I guess a chupacabra does,” Parma said.
Most people in DeWitt County are convinced this is the elusive chupacabra, but what do wildlife experts have to say?
“The animal in the cage as best I can tell from the view is some sort of a small canine,” Brent Ortego, Wildlife Diversity Biologist with Texas Parks and Wildlife, said.
Ortego said a canine can include a coyote, dog, or even a fox. He said the animal most likely has mange which has caused it to lose its hair. But as for a chupacabra, he thinks otherwise.
“It’s never been proven to be a unique species. It was always something out there that allegedly was said to cause harm to people or livestock,” Ortego said.
Chupacabra or not, right now this little guy is staying at the Stock household, living off a diet of cat food and corn, at least until someone can find out what it really is.
“We were just trying to figure out what it is because we’ve never seen anything like it before,” Stock said.
The Biologist Ortego claimed that , “The animal in the cage as best I can tell from the view is some sort of a small canine.”
A look at the front paws of the creature and the way it consumes food, easily tells it is not canine in nature.
The commenters on the news agency’s site immediately identified the hairless fellow, as a hairless raccoon. They even submitted a few links, where these pictures conclusively tells all.
We have to remember folks, that science is not perfect, because it always has a human element to it.
Till Next Time,